From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shockner v. Soltanian

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:18-cv-1948 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-cv-1948 TLN KJN P

09-28-2021

MANFRED SHOCKNER, Plaintiff, v. DR. SOLTANIAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff's motion for a court order directing defendants to answer the remaining claims (ECF No. 101) is denied.

On August 30, 2021, the Honorable Troy L. Nunley denied defendants' motions to dismiss and ordered defendants to respond to plaintiff's second amended complaint within thirty days of the electronic filing of the order. (ECF No. 100.)

In the pending motion, filed September 24, 2021, plaintiff requests that the court order defendants to respond to his claims. (ECF No. 101.) Plaintiff's motion is denied as unnecessary because on August 30, 2021, the Judge Nunley ordered defendants to respond to plaintiff's second amended complaint within thirty days.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for a court order directing defendants to answer his remaining claims (ECF No. 101) is denied.


Summaries of

Shockner v. Soltanian

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:18-cv-1948 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Shockner v. Soltanian

Case Details

Full title:MANFRED SHOCKNER, Plaintiff, v. DR. SOLTANIAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

2:18-cv-1948 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)