From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shockley v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Sep 12, 1931
3 P.2d 236 (Okla. Crim. App. 1931)

Opinion

No. A-8058.

September 12, 1931.

(Syllabus.)

Intoxicating Liquors — Conviction for Possession of Still Sustained. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgment.

Appeal from County Court, McCurtain County; Wm. A. Tidwell, Judge.

Frank Shockley was convicted of the unlawful possession of a still, and he appeals. Affirmed.

M. F. Hudson, for plaintiff in error.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was by information jointly charged with Bill Kemp of having in their possession a still, was convicted, and the defendant Shockley was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and imprisonment for 30 days in the county jail, and appeals.

The testimony is sufficient to sustain the judgment.

There are no fundamental errors in the record possessing sufficient merit to warrant a reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

EDWARDS and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shockley v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Sep 12, 1931
3 P.2d 236 (Okla. Crim. App. 1931)
Case details for

Shockley v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANK SHOCKLEY v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 12, 1931

Citations

3 P.2d 236 (Okla. Crim. App. 1931)
3 P.2d 236