From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shockley v. Okeke

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 14, 2006
277 Conn. 923 (Conn. 2006)

Opinion

Edward C. Okeke, pro se, in support of the petition.

Tamara A. Shockley, pro se, in opposition.

Decided March 14, 2006.


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 76 (AC 25935), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal from the Probate Court?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17631.


Summaries of

Shockley v. Okeke

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 14, 2006
277 Conn. 923 (Conn. 2006)
Case details for

Shockley v. Okeke

Case Details

Full title:TAMARA A. SHOCKLEY v. EDWARD C. OKEKE

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 14, 2006

Citations

277 Conn. 923 (Conn. 2006)

Citing Cases

Shockley v. Okeke

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: "Did the…