From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shockley v. Commonwealth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 15, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-192 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-192

08-15-2013

JERMAINE SHOCKLEY, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH, et al., Respondents.


Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter


OPINION AND ORDER

The Petitioner, Jermaine Shockley, is currently incarcerated in the State Correctional Institution Forest, located in Marienville, Pennsylvania ("SCI Forest"). Before the Court is his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 1] and an accompanying petition for a writ of habeas corpus that he seeks to litigate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court shall grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and direct the Clerk's Office to file the petition.

In the petition, Schockley is challenging the judgment of sentence imposed upon him on July 27, 2009, by the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County at Criminal Docket No. CP-23-CR-8078-2007. SCI Forest is located within the territorial boundaries of this District. Delaware County is located within the territorial boundaries of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

When a state prisoner files a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a state like Pennsylvania, that contains two or more Federal judicial districts,

the application may be filed in the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the district within which the State court was held which convicted and sentenced him and each of such district courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to entertain the application. The district court for the district wherein such an application is filed in the exercise of its discretion and in furtherance of justice may transfer the application to the other district court for hearing and determination.
28 U.S.C. § 2241(d) (emphasis added).

Shockley was tried, convicted, and sentenced in the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County and, therefore, most, if not all, of the relevant activity occurred within the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Thus, this Court finds that the furtherance of justice, as well as the convenience of the parties, would be better served by transferring this case to the Eastern District Court. This decision is in accordance with the agreed practice of the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Middle, and Western Districts of Pennsylvania, which is to transfer any habeas petitions filed by state prisoners in their respective districts to the district in which the county where the judgment of sentence was had is located.

An appropriate Order follows.

____________________________

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

United States Magistrate Judge

JERMAINE SHOCKLEY, Petitioner,

v. COMMONWEALTH, et al., Respondents.

Civil Action No. 13-192 Erie


Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter


ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2013;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 1] is GRANTED. The Clerk's Office is directed to file the petition.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

____________________________

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Shockley v. Commonwealth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 15, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-192 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Shockley v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:JERMAINE SHOCKLEY, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 15, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-192 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2013)