From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shivers v. Citibank, N.A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 2004
12 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4635

November 16, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane A. Lebedeff, J.), entered November 17, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant's motion to dismiss the cause of action for conversion of funds, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner and Sweeny, JJ.


This action stems from the deposit into a joint bank account of a number of checks containing allegedly forged endorsements. Whether a bank acted in a commercially reasonable manner with respect to accepting for deposit an instrument from someone who was not the true owner (UCC 3-419) is generally a question of fact ( Holland Am. Cruises v. Carver Fed. Sav. Loan Assn., 60 AD2d 545). Having failed to submit any evidence that its acceptance of these checks comported with reasonable commercial standards under the circumstances, defendant was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law.


Summaries of

Shivers v. Citibank, N.A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 2004
12 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Shivers v. Citibank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS COYOTE SHIVERS, Respondent, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Appellant. (And a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 2004

Citations

12 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
783 N.Y.S.2d 818

Citing Cases

YRB Nyc, Inc. v. Sovereign Bank of N.Y., Citibank, N.A.

Accordingly, the court will evaluate the instant motions under UCC § 3-419(3), which would preclude a finding…

NAT'L TIT. INS. OF NY v. SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT

Apparently, the money that was credited to the Spectrum account when the improperly endorsed check was…