From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shively v. Blue Ridge

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Sep 26, 2006
Record No. 1313-06-3 (Va. Ct. App. Sep. 26, 2006)

Opinion

Record No. 1313-06-3.

September 26, 2006.

Appeal from the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission.

(Karel Brown Ryan; Ryan Law Firm, PC, on brief), for appellant.

(Richard D. Lucas; Lucas Law Firm, PLC, on brief), for appellees.

Present: Judges Kelsey, Petty and Senior Judge Bumgardner.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.


Timothy Wayne Shively (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission finding that his claim was time barred. Claimant contends the commission erred in finding that (1) he was not entitled to a de facto award; and (2) the doctrine of imposition did not apply to save his claim from the limitations bar. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Shively v. Blue Ridge Aquaculture, VWC File No. 210-64-93 (April 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Shively v. Blue Ridge

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Sep 26, 2006
Record No. 1313-06-3 (Va. Ct. App. Sep. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Shively v. Blue Ridge

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY WAYNE SHIVELY v. BLUE RIDGE AQUACULTURE AND ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Sep 26, 2006

Citations

Record No. 1313-06-3 (Va. Ct. App. Sep. 26, 2006)