Opinion
WCB 86-00068; CA A45095
Argued and submitted March 16, 1988
Remanded for reconsideration June 15, 1988
Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.
Paul L. Roess, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Acker, Underwood Smith, Portland.
Marianne Bottini, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Larry D. Schucht and Bottini, Bottini Lehner, Portland.
Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Graber, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Remanded for reconsideration.
Employer and its insurance carrier seek review of a Workers' Compensation Board order. The petition for judicial review was filed on July 24, 1987, and we therefore review for substantial evidence. Or Laws 1987, ch 884, § 12a; Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or. App. 200, 205, 752 P.2d 312 (1988). Because the Board order is inadequate for judicial review under the standards in Armstrong, we remand to the Board for reconsideration.
Remanded for reconsideration.