From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shinn v. Ramirez

Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 2021
141 S. Ct. 2620 (2021)

Summary

granting certiorari in both cases

Summary of this case from Balentine v. Lumpkin

Opinion

No. 20-1009.

05-17-2021

David SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, Petitioner, v. David Martinez RAMIREZ; and David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation Reentry, et al., Petitioners, v. Barry Lee Jones.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.


Summaries of

Shinn v. Ramirez

Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 2021
141 S. Ct. 2620 (2021)

granting certiorari in both cases

Summary of this case from Balentine v. Lumpkin

In Shinn, the Supreme Court has granted review to decide whether “application of the equitable rule this Court announced in Martinez v. Ryan render[s] 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(2) inapplicable to a federal court's merits review of a claim for habeas relief?

Summary of this case from Cole v. Lumpkin
Case details for

Shinn v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:David SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States.

Date published: May 17, 2021

Citations

141 S. Ct. 2620 (2021)
209 L. Ed. 2d 748

Citing Cases

Mothershead v. Wofford

And in this instance, it is proper to consider additional evidence to determine whether the procedural…

Evans v. Garman

6 Evans additionally asserts in his reply brief that the case should be stayed pending the Supreme Court's…