From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shine v. Hofmann

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Oct 27, 2008
File No. 2:06 CV 237 (D. Vt. Oct. 27, 2008)

Opinion

File No. 2:06 CV 237.

October 27, 2008


ORDER


The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed October 6, 2008. Plaintiff's objections were filed October 22, 2008.

A district judge must make a de novo determination of those portions of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation to which an objection is made. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Perez-Rubio v. Wyckoff, 718 F.Supp. 217, 227 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). The district judge may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations." Id.

After careful review of the file, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the objections, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full.

The plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining and preliminary injunction (Paper 46) is DENIED. In addition, plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint (Paper 33), motion for appointment of counsel (Paper 44), and motion to compel (Paper 45) are DENIED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Shine v. Hofmann

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Oct 27, 2008
File No. 2:06 CV 237 (D. Vt. Oct. 27, 2008)
Case details for

Shine v. Hofmann

Case Details

Full title:Cassius Lamar Shine, Plaintiff, v. Robert Hofmann, Susan Blair, Jodie…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Oct 27, 2008

Citations

File No. 2:06 CV 237 (D. Vt. Oct. 27, 2008)