Opinion
22 Civ. 3704 (LGS)
12-12-2022
SHINANO KENSHI CORP., et al., Plaintiffs, v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant.
ORDER
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, DISTRICT JUDGE:
WHEREAS, on November 10, 2022, the parties filed a joint letter requesting an extension of discovery deadlines. An Order issued November 14, 2022, granted the parties' request. That Order directed the parties to file a joint letter regarding any discovery dispute requiring judicial resolution by December 9, 2022. It further requires the parties to submit the names of any deponents and a date for their depositions agreeable to counsel and the witness.
WHEREAS, on December 9, 2022, the parties filed the required letter. It is hereby
ORDERED that the Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order is amended. The following depositions shall be taken on the following dates:
Sawato Aizeki - February 7, 2023
Mayumi Dabbay - February 9, 2023
Nick Lauro - February 10, 2023
Anil Kumar - February 14, 2023
Alex Grigorow - February 16, 2023
Tex Moseri - February 17, 2023
Alban Gousett - February 20, 2023
Michael Benson - March 3, 2023
Plaintiff Shinano Kenshi Corp.'s Rule 30(b)(6) witness - March 14, 2023
Plaintiff Shinano Kenshi Co., Ltd.'s Rule 30(b)(6) witness - March 15, 2023
Defendant's Rule 30(b)(6) witness - March 17, 2023Notwithstanding the parties' statement regarding the reservation of rights to amend or modify these dates, these deposition dates may not be changed without judicial approval. An Amended Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order will issue separately. It is further
ORDERED that in the status letter due December 14, 2022, the parties shall state a firm date for the deposition of Maria Adriana Vazquez, agreeable to counsel for both parties and the witness, for incorporation into the case management plan. It is further
ORDERED that Defendant shall produce documents related to the categories of information specified in Section II(b) of the parties' letter, for the reasons stated in Plaintiffs' portion of that Section. The parties shall meet and confer in good faith to narrow the scope of the request to minimize any burden on Defendant that is disproportionate to the relevance of the information, provided that the parties shall confer in light of the Court's holding that the three categories of information listed are relevant to Plaintiffs' claims. It is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for a conference is DENIED as moot. To the extent the parties have further disputes in need of judicial resolution relating to document production, they shall file a joint letter on ECF promptly and with sufficient time to meet existing discovery deadlines.