From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shim-Larkin v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 11, 2024
16 Civ. 6099 (AT) (JW) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2024)

Opinion

16 Civ. 6099 (AT) (JW)

01-11-2024

Heena Shim-Larkin, Plaintiff, v. City of New York, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

ANALISA TORRES, DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has been advised by the Honorable Jennifer E. Willis that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle. Accordingly, the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty-day period to be so-ordered by the Court. Per Rule IV(C) of the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shim-Larkin v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 11, 2024
16 Civ. 6099 (AT) (JW) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2024)
Case details for

Shim-Larkin v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:Heena Shim-Larkin, Plaintiff, v. City of New York, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 11, 2024

Citations

16 Civ. 6099 (AT) (JW) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2024)