From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shilo v. Shilo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 8, 2019
177 A.D.3d 1315 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

985 CAF 18–01905

11-08-2019

In the Matter of Tatyana Sokol SHILO, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Leonid SHILO, Respondent–Respondent.

SCOTT T. GODKIN, WHITESBORO, FOR PETITIONER–APPELLANT. C. LOUIS ABELOVE, UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT–RESPONDENT. JESSICA REYNOLDS–AMUSO, CLINTON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN.


SCOTT T. GODKIN, WHITESBORO, FOR PETITIONER–APPELLANT.

C. LOUIS ABELOVE, UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT–RESPONDENT.

JESSICA REYNOLDS–AMUSO, CLINTON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: In this Family Court Act article 6 proceeding, petitioner appeals from an order dismissing her petition seeking permission to relocate to South Carolina with the subject children. While this appeal was pending, Family Court entered an order upon consent of the parties that modified the custody and visitation arrangement. That order renders the appeal moot, and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply (see Matter of Thomas v. Thomas, 151 A.D.3d 1919, 1920, 57 N.Y.S.3d 849 [4th Dept. 2017] ).


Summaries of

Shilo v. Shilo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 8, 2019
177 A.D.3d 1315 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Shilo v. Shilo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Tatyana Sokol SHILO, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Leonid…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 8, 2019

Citations

177 A.D.3d 1315 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
110 N.Y.S.3d 355