Opinion
985 CAF 18–01905
11-08-2019
In the Matter of Tatyana Sokol SHILO, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Leonid SHILO, Respondent–Respondent.
SCOTT T. GODKIN, WHITESBORO, FOR PETITIONER–APPELLANT. C. LOUIS ABELOVE, UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT–RESPONDENT. JESSICA REYNOLDS–AMUSO, CLINTON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN.
SCOTT T. GODKIN, WHITESBORO, FOR PETITIONER–APPELLANT.
C. LOUIS ABELOVE, UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT–RESPONDENT.
JESSICA REYNOLDS–AMUSO, CLINTON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: In this Family Court Act article 6 proceeding, petitioner appeals from an order dismissing her petition seeking permission to relocate to South Carolina with the subject children. While this appeal was pending, Family Court entered an order upon consent of the parties that modified the custody and visitation arrangement. That order renders the appeal moot, and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply (see Matter of Thomas v. Thomas, 151 A.D.3d 1919, 1920, 57 N.Y.S.3d 849 [4th Dept. 2017] ).