From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shillingford v. Saxe

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Feb 21, 2013
38 Misc. 3d 144 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

No. 571063/12.

2013-02-21

Ella SHILLINGFORD, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Phyllis SAXE, Defendant–Respondent.


Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Andrea Masley, J.), dated August 15, 2012, which denied her motion, in effect, to vacate a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the action.
Present: LOWE, III, P.J., SCHOENFELD, HUNTER, JR., JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Order (Andrea Masley, J.), dated August 15, 2012, reversed, without costs, motion granted and matter remanded to Civil Court for an inquest.

Upon defendant's failure to appear in this small claims action, the court referred the matter to a referee to hold an inquest, and to hear and report her findings to the court ( seeCPLR 3215[b] ). Following the inquest, the referee issued a “report” that consisted merely of a check mark placed in a box on a preprinted form signifying that the case was “Dismissed.” So far as shown, no “findings of facts [or] conclusions of law” (CPLR 4320[b] ) were made by the referee, nor were the inquest proceedings transcribed ( id.). In this posture, and since the sorry state of the record precludes any effective appellate review of the matter, we are constrained to order a new inquest ( see Murphy v. Murphy, 144 A.D.2d 904 [1988];Hynard v. Apt., Inc., 2001 N.Y. Slip Op 40561[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2001] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

Shillingford v. Saxe

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Feb 21, 2013
38 Misc. 3d 144 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Shillingford v. Saxe

Case Details

Full title:Ella Shillingford, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Phyllis Saxe…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

38 Misc. 3d 144 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 50266
967 N.Y.S.2d 870

Citing Cases

Pierre v. Watson

There is no record of the testimony given at the inquest. Since the incomplete state of the record precludes…