Opinion
519865
08-06-2015
Eric J. Shields, Moravia, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.
Eric J. Shields, Moravia, appellant pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.
Opinion Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Elliot, J.), entered June 4, 2014 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 challenging two prison disciplinary determinations. Respondent moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that the proceeding was not commenced within the four-month statute of limitations provided in CPLR 217(1). Supreme Court granted the motion and petitioner now appeals.
We affirm. Petitioner received notification that the challenged disciplinary determinations had been administratively affirmed on February 15, 2013 and on March 12, 2013. Given that the instant proceeding was not commenced until November 21, 2013, more than four months thereafter (see CPLR 217[1] ), it was clearly time-barred (see Matter of Jackson v. Fischer, 78 A.D.3d 1335, 909 N.Y.S.2d 681 [2010], lv. denied 16 N.Y.3d 705, 2011 WL 536609 [2011] ; Matter of Smith v. Goord, 42 A.D.3d 839, 838 N.Y.S.2d 922 [2007] ). Petitioner's request for reconsideration did not operate to toll the statute of limitations (see Matter of Savinon v. Bezio, 79 A.D.3d 1519, 912 N.Y.S.2d 456 [2010] ; Matter of Jenkins v. Goord, 288 A.D.2d 732, 733, 732 N.Y.S.2d 915 [2001], appeal dismissed 97 N.Y.2d 748, 742 N.Y.S.2d 606, 769 N.E.2d 353 [2002] ). Therefore, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition. In view of this disposition, we are foreclosed from addressing the merits of petitioner's claims.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
PETERS, P.J., GARRY, EGAN JR. and LYNCH, JJ., concur.