From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shibley v. Hart

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Jan 5, 1931
110 Cal.App. 759 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)

Opinion

Docket No. 7348.

January 5, 1931.

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel respondent as phonographic reporter of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco to prepare and certify a transcript. Dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Milton T. U'Ren for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] An application for a writ of mandamus in the above-entitled matter was filed February 6, 1930, and an alternative writ of mandate was granted and made returnable for March 10, 1930. No showing was made on that day, and since that date numerous continuances have been granted upon the request of the petitioner, but to this date the petitioner has failed to appear and has failed to make any showing why a peremptory writ should issue.

It is therefore ordered that for lack of prosecution the proceedings are dismissed and the alternative writ is discharged.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on February 4, 1931.


Summaries of

Shibley v. Hart

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Jan 5, 1931
110 Cal.App. 759 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
Case details for

Shibley v. Hart

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH SHIBLEY, Petitioner, v. HAROLD H. HART, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two

Date published: Jan 5, 1931

Citations

110 Cal.App. 759 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
295 P. 79