From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shetty v. Hampton Univ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Newport News Division
Jan 24, 2014
ACTION NO. 4:12cv158 (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2014)

Summary

finding PIP not enough to substantiate constructive discharge claim

Summary of this case from Sancho v. Anderson Sch. Dist. Four

Opinion

ACTION NO. 4:12cv158

01-24-2014

ANAND SHETTY, Plaintiff, v. HAMPTON UNIVERSITY, Defendant.


FINAL ORDER

This matter comes before the court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed on June 20, 2013, and the Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer filed on June 24, 2013, by the Defendant, Hampton University. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard by Order of July 9, 2013, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and Local Civil Rule 72, to conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, if necessary, and to submit to the undersigned proposed findings of fact, if applicable, and recommendations for the disposition of the Motions.

The United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed on January 3, 2014. The Magistrate Judge recommended granting the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, dismissing with prejudice the First Amended Complaint, filed by the Plaintiff, Anand Shetty, and dismissing as moot the Defendant's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer.

By copy of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the parties were advised of their right to file written objections thereto. The court has received no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing the same has expired.

The court does hereby adopt and approve the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on January 3, 2014. Accordingly, the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, the Plainti ff's First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the Defendant's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer is DISMISSED as MOOT.

Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment for the Defendant. Further, the Clerk shall forward a copy of this Final Order to counsel of all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

Rebecca Beach Smith

Chief

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Shetty v. Hampton Univ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Newport News Division
Jan 24, 2014
ACTION NO. 4:12cv158 (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2014)

finding PIP not enough to substantiate constructive discharge claim

Summary of this case from Sancho v. Anderson Sch. Dist. Four

finding PIP not enough to substantiate constructive discharge claim

Summary of this case from Bradley v. U.S. Foods, Inc.
Case details for

Shetty v. Hampton Univ.

Case Details

Full title:ANAND SHETTY, Plaintiff, v. HAMPTON UNIVERSITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Newport News Division

Date published: Jan 24, 2014

Citations

ACTION NO. 4:12cv158 (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2014)

Citing Cases

Tang v. E. Va. Med. Sch.

While a negative performance evaluation could tangibly affect the terms and conditions of employment, such an…

Tang v. E. Va. Med. Sch.

"A 'downgrade of a performance evaluation could effect [sic] a term, condition, or benefit of employment' if…