From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sherwin v. Infinity Auto Insurance Company

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 17, 2011
2:11-CV-43 JCM (LRL) (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

2:11-CV-43 JCM (LRL).

October 17, 2011


ORDER


Presently before the court is defendant Infinity Insurance Company's motion in limine to prohibit the introduction of postlitigation conduct by attorney as evidence in support of claim. (Doc. #46). Plaintiff Tara Ann Sherwin opposed the motion (doc. #54), and Infinity filed a reply (doc. #58).

Currently, there is no trial date for this matter. The parties have recently stipulated to extend the deadline to file a joint pretrial order to March 13, 2012. Accordingly, the trial for this matter is likely at least six months away. Without an approaching trial date or the close of discovery, the court is not prepared to rule on the merits of defendant's motion. Defendant may renew this motion at a more appropriate time.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant Infinity Auto Insurance Company's motion in limine (doc. #46) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Sherwin v. Infinity Auto Insurance Company

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 17, 2011
2:11-CV-43 JCM (LRL) (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Sherwin v. Infinity Auto Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:TARA ANN SHERWIN, Plaintiff, v. INFINITY AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

2:11-CV-43 JCM (LRL) (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)