From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sherman v. Williams

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 5, 2010
Case No. 2:09-CV-01411-KJD-(RJJ) (D. Nev. Oct. 5, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-CV-01411-KJD-(RJJ).

October 5, 2010


ORDER


The court instructed petitioner to file a third amended petition, because his second amended petition (#20) was too vague to warrant relief. Order (#22). Petitioner has not complied within the allotted time, and the court will dismiss the action.

Reasonable jurists would not find this conclusion to be debatable or wrong, and the court will not issue a certificate of appealability.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for petitioner's failure to comply with the court's order (#22). The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DATED: October 5, 2010


Summaries of

Sherman v. Williams

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 5, 2010
Case No. 2:09-CV-01411-KJD-(RJJ) (D. Nev. Oct. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Sherman v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:TONY SHERMAN, Petitioner, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 5, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:09-CV-01411-KJD-(RJJ) (D. Nev. Oct. 5, 2010)