From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sherman v. Jackson

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 2, 2010
5:09CV00382 BSM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jun. 2, 2010)

Opinion

5:09CV00382 BSM/JTR.

June 2, 2010


ORDER


The court has received the recommended disposition from United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After carefully reviewing the recomended disposition and reviewing the record de novo, it is concluded that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in all respects in its entirety.

Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to the three strikes rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Further, it is hereby certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sherman v. Jackson

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 2, 2010
5:09CV00382 BSM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jun. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Sherman v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK L. SHERMAN ADC #96304 PLAINTIFF v. HAZEL M. JACKSON, Records…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Jun 2, 2010

Citations

5:09CV00382 BSM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jun. 2, 2010)