From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sherman v. City of Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 12, 2012
No. CIV S- 11-0820 JAM GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S- 11-0820 JAM GGH PS

01-12-2012

JOSEPH A. SHERMAN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DAVIS, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

By order of November 9, 2011, plaintiff's "motion for summary judgment," filed September 27, 2011, was vacated without prejudice as premature based on a motion to dismiss that was pending before the court. At that time, the court stated that to the extent possible, it would construe plaintiff's filing as an opposition to the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has since filed a "motion for hearing" in regard to that vacated summary judgment motion.

For the reasons stated in this court's November 9, 2011 order, IT IS ORDERED that: Plaintiff's motion for hearing on his summary judgment motion, filed November 18, 2011, (dkt. no. 15), is denied.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Sherman v. City of Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 12, 2012
No. CIV S- 11-0820 JAM GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Sherman v. City of Davis

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH A. SHERMAN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DAVIS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 12, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S- 11-0820 JAM GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)