From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sheridan v. Rosenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1923
207 App. Div. 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Opinion

November, 1923.


Motion to stay the trial of the actions denied. The defendants entered upon the former trial without objection and without raising the question of the pendency of the criminal proceeding. We think it now too late to claim a postponement on that ground. Moreover, the defendants voluntarily made full and exhaustive statements to the district attorney, which were read in evidence on the hearing before the committing magistrate, and since the reversals and the restoration of the cases to the day calendar for trial they have repeatedly answered "ready." Kelly, P.J., Manning, Kelby and Kapper, JJ., concur; Rich, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Sheridan v. Rosenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1923
207 App. Div. 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for

Sheridan v. Rosenthal

Case Details

Full title:MAY SHERIDAN, as Administratrix, etc., Plaintiff, Impleaded with MARY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1923

Citations

207 App. Div. 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)