From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sheridan v. Harrington

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Apr 18, 2014
NO. 03-13-00500-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 18, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 03-13-00500-CV

04-18-2014

William Earl Sheridan, Appellant v. Angelia Harrington, Appellee


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-05-000021, HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING


MEMORANDUM OPINION

After William Earl Sheridan, acting pro se, failed to timely file his appellant's brief, the clerk of this Court wrote him advising that his brief was overdue and that if he did not file his brief or otherwise respond by March 10, 2014, his appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. On March 11, 2014, Sheridan filed a motion requesting a 30-day extension of time to file his brief. Sheridan's motion was rejected because it lacked a proper certificate of service. The clerk of this Court again wrote Sheridan, advising him that if he did not file his brief or otherwise respond by April 7, 2014, his appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. The April 7 deadline has passed, and Sheridan has made no response. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a); 42.3(b).

__________

Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose Dismissed for Want of Prosecution


Summaries of

Sheridan v. Harrington

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Apr 18, 2014
NO. 03-13-00500-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Sheridan v. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:William Earl Sheridan, Appellant v. Angelia Harrington, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Apr 18, 2014

Citations

NO. 03-13-00500-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 18, 2014)