Opinion
3:23-cv-00473-LRH-CSD
10-26-2023
MICHAEL SHERIDAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DRAGONFLY ENERGY CORPORATION; SENTRYLINK LLC; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.
Mark R. Thierman, Nev. Bar No. 8285 Joshua D. Buck, Nev. Bar No. 12187 Leah L. Jones, Nev. Bar No. 13161 THIERMAN BUCK LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Sarah Ferguson, Nev. Bar No. 14515 PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER Attorney for Defendant Dragonfly Energy Corporation
Mark R. Thierman, Nev. Bar No. 8285 Joshua D. Buck, Nev. Bar No. 12187 Leah L. Jones, Nev. Bar No. 13161 THIERMAN BUCK LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff
Sarah Ferguson, Nev. Bar No. 14515 PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER Attorney for Defendant Dragonfly Energy Corporation
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT DRAGONFLY'S MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST)
LARRY R. HICKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff MICHAEL SHERIDAN (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants DRAGONFLY ENERGY CORPORATION (“Defendant”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to extend the time for: (1) Plaintiff to file an opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by 14 days from the current deadline of November 1, 2023, up to and including November 15, 2023, and (2) for Defendants to file their reply in support up to and including November 28, 2023.
This is the first request for an extension of time to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint.
The instant request for an extension is needed because Counsel for both Parties have current and previously arranged family travel and Holiday plans. This extension is requested and sought prior to the expiration of the deadlines in question. The Parties agree and represent to the Court that this request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.