From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sherfield v. Diaz

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Aug 5, 2024
No. CIV-23-1037-J (W.D. Okla. Aug. 5, 2024)

Opinion

CIV-23-1037-J

08-05-2024

ANTONIO D. SHERFIELD, SR., Plaintiff, v. FNU DIAZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

BERNARD M. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed a complaint alleging violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 626(b)(1)(B),(C). [Doc. No. 4]. Thereafter, Judge Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the complaint be dismissed without prejudice based upon Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. [Doc. No. 29]. Plaintiff was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by July 16, 2024. No objection has been filed. Plaintiff has therefore waived any right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues in the Report and Recommendation. See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 29] and DISMISSES the complaint without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sherfield v. Diaz

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Aug 5, 2024
No. CIV-23-1037-J (W.D. Okla. Aug. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Sherfield v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO D. SHERFIELD, SR., Plaintiff, v. FNU DIAZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 5, 2024

Citations

No. CIV-23-1037-J (W.D. Okla. Aug. 5, 2024)