From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shepherd v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Apr 16, 2006
No. CV 05-4126-PHX-MHM (MEA) (D. Ariz. Apr. 16, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV 05-4126-PHX-MHM (MEA).

April 16, 2006


ORDER


This is a civil rights action filed by a county jail inmate. The notice of assignment mailed to Plaintiff two months ago was returned with a notation that Plaintiff had been released from jail. See Dkt. #3. Plaintiff has not informed the Court of his new address, and the jail information line and state prison website contain no information regarding his whereabouts. It is Plaintiff's burden to keep the Court apprised of his address, and the Court need not hold this action in abeyance indefinitely awaiting an updated address that may never arrive. See Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988) ( per curiam). The Court will therefore dismiss the action for failure to prosecute.See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

IT IS ORDERED that the Complaint and this action are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Shepherd v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Apr 16, 2006
No. CV 05-4126-PHX-MHM (MEA) (D. Ariz. Apr. 16, 2006)
Case details for

Shepherd v. Arpaio

Case Details

Full title:James D. Shepherd, Plaintiff, v. Joseph M. Arpaio, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Apr 16, 2006

Citations

No. CV 05-4126-PHX-MHM (MEA) (D. Ariz. Apr. 16, 2006)