From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shepersky v. Wengler

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jan 28, 2010
Civil No. 09-2049 (PJS/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 28, 2010)

Summary

finding that habeas petitioner fairly presented claim that his Alford plea lacked a sufficient factual basis by citing North Carolina v. Alford to appellate court and attacking the factual basis for his Alford plea

Summary of this case from Berry v. Fluke

Opinion

Civil No. 09-2049 (PJS/SRN).

January 28, 2010

Michael Allen Shepersky, Minnesota Correctional Facility, 1101 Linden Lane, Faribault, Minnesota 55021, Pro Se.

Russell Conrow, Lake County Attorney, Lake County Attorney's Office, 601 3rd Ave., Two Harbors, Minnesota 55616, for Defendant


ORDER


The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Shepersky v. Wengler

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jan 28, 2010
Civil No. 09-2049 (PJS/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 28, 2010)

finding that habeas petitioner fairly presented claim that his Alford plea lacked a sufficient factual basis by citing North Carolina v. Alford to appellate court and attacking the factual basis for his Alford plea

Summary of this case from Berry v. Fluke
Case details for

Shepersky v. Wengler

Case Details

Full title:Michael Allen Shepersky, Petitioner, v. Timothy Wengler, Warden, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jan 28, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-2049 (PJS/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 28, 2010)

Citing Cases

Considine v. Hammer

Accordingly, Petitioner's state court judgment became final and the AEDPA one-year statute of limitations…

Berry v. Fluke

Berry fairly presented Ground I of his petition in his direct appeal to the Supreme Court of South Dakota; he…