From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shepard v. Marathon Staffing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 10, 2014
Case No. 2:13-cv-02261-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Jul. 10, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-cv-02261-JCM-PAL

07-10-2014

TANYA C. SHEPARD, Plaintiff, v. MARATHON STAFFING, INC., Defendant.


REPORT OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Tanya C. Shepard is proceeding in this action pro se. Because the court granted Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, the court screened the pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The undersigned found that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. #4) failed to state a claim and allowed Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or requested an extension of time or taken any other action to prosecute this case. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the screening order would result in a recommendation to the district judge that this case be dismissed.

Accordingly,

IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Complaint (Dkt. #4) be DISMISSED.

Dated this 10th day of July, 2014.

/s/_________

PEGGY A. LEEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. Pursuant to Local Rule of Practice (LR) IB 3-2(a), any party wishing to object to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge shall file and serve specific written objections together with points and authorities in support of those objections, within fourteen days of the date of service of the findings and recommendations. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's Order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). The points and authorities filed in support of the specific written objections are subject to the page limitations found in LR 7-4.


Summaries of

Shepard v. Marathon Staffing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 10, 2014
Case No. 2:13-cv-02261-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Jul. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Shepard v. Marathon Staffing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TANYA C. SHEPARD, Plaintiff, v. MARATHON STAFFING, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 10, 2014

Citations

Case No. 2:13-cv-02261-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Jul. 10, 2014)