From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shepard v. Borum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2020
Case No. 1:18-cv-00277-DAD-JDP (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 1:18-cv-00277-DAD-JDP

03-27-2020

LAMONT SHEPARD, Plaintiff, v. M. BORUM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO CORRECT SERVICE AND EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO OBJECT TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OBJECTIONS DUE FOURTEEN DAYS AFTER CORRECTED PROOF OF SERVICE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 25, 2020, he notified the court that he had not received defendants' March 12, 2020, response to the court's order to show cause. See ECF No. 57. Indeed, defendants' proof of service appears defective because it shows the wrong address for plaintiff. See ECF No. 52-4. Thus, we direct defendants to correct service and file a new proof of service of their response to the court's order to show cause. ECF No. 52.

The documents in that response were used by the court to evaluate plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 29, and issue the pending findings and recommendations to deny it, ECF No. 53. Thus, we extend the deadline to file objections to our findings and recommendations until fourteen days after defendants have filed the corrected proof of service. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 27, 2020

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE No. 204.


Summaries of

Shepard v. Borum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2020
Case No. 1:18-cv-00277-DAD-JDP (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Shepard v. Borum

Case Details

Full title:LAMONT SHEPARD, Plaintiff, v. M. BORUM, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 27, 2020

Citations

Case No. 1:18-cv-00277-DAD-JDP (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2020)