Shenzhen Root Tech. Co. v. Chiaro Tech.

Full title: SHENZHEN ROOT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., HONG KONG LUTE TECHNOLOGY CO.…

Court: United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Oct 2, 2023

2:23-cv-00631-KKE (W.D. Wash. Oct. 2, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00631-KKE

10-02-2023

SHENZHEN ROOT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., HONG KONG LUTE TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, AND SHENZHEN CONGLIN E-COMMERCE CO., LTD., Plaintiffs, v. CHIARO TECHNOLOGY LTD., Defendant. CHIARO TECHNOLOGY LTD., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. SHENZHEN ROOT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., HONG KONG LUTE TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, SHENZHEN CONGLIN E-COMMERCE CO., LTD, SHENZHEN ROOT E-COMMERCE CO., LTD., SHENZHEN TPH TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., SHENZHEN JINRUIXING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., SHENZHEN LUTEJIACHENG NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and SHENZHEN JINRUIHANG TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Counterclaim Defendants.

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP PAUL T. MEIKLEJOHN WSBA # 17477 ERIN KOLTER WSBA #53365 ROBERT J.M. LEE WSBA # 49971 Dorsey & Whitney LLP ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS Shenzhen Root Technology Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Lute Technology Co., Limited, and Shenzhen Conglin E-Commerce Co., Ltd. AND COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS Shenzhen Root Technology Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Lute Technology Co., Limited, Shenzhen Conglin E-Commerce Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Jinruihang Technology Co., Ltd., AND Shenzhen Lutejiacheng Network Technology Co., Ltd.

Kymberly K. Evanson United States District Judge

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP PAUL T. MEIKLEJOHN WSBA # 17477 ERIN KOLTER WSBA #53365 ROBERT J.M. LEE WSBA # 49971 Dorsey & Whitney LLP ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS Shenzhen Root Technology Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Lute Technology Co., Limited, and Shenzhen Conglin E-Commerce Co., Ltd. AND COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS Shenzhen Root Technology Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Lute Technology Co., Limited, Shenzhen Conglin E-Commerce Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Jinruihang Technology Co., Ltd., AND Shenzhen Lutejiacheng Network Technology Co., Ltd.

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS

Kymberly K. Evanson United States District Judge

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the unopposed motion of Counterclaim Defendants Shenzhen Root Technology Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Lute Technology Co., Limited, Shenzhen Conglin Ecommerce Co. Ltd., Shenzhen Jinruihang Technology Co., Ltd., and Shenzhen Lutejiacheng Network Technology Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Moving Counterclaim Defendants”), through their attorneys, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, requesting that the Court extend the deadline for Moving Counterclaim Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Counterclaim. Upon review of the unopposed motion, the Court GRANTS the motion.

Moving Counterclaim Defendants' deadline to respond to Counterclaim Plaintiff's Counterclaim (Dkt. 69) is extended up to and including October 26, 2023.

SO ORDERED