Shelton v. Olowosoyo

3 Citing cases

  1. Mason v. Ford

    176 Conn. App. 658 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017)   Cited 1 times

    (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Shelton v. Olowosoyo , 125 Conn.App. 286, 294, 10 A.3d 45 (2010). Therefore, on remand, the trial court may not order an effective date earlier than June 14, 2016.

  2. Housing Authority v. Brown

    129 Conn. App. 313 (Conn. App. Ct. 2011)   Cited 2 times
    Holding that Connecticut's statute providing a right to “remedy by repair” a lease violation did not apply to drug-related criminal activity

    " (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Shelton v. Olowosoyo, 125 Conn. App. 286, 291, 10 A.3d 45 (2010). "Summary process is a special statutory procedure designed to provide an expeditious remedy. . . . It enable[s] landlords to obtain possession of leased premises without suffering the delay, loss and expense to which, under the common-law actions, they might be subjected by tenants wrongfully holding over their terms."

  3. Rubin v. Town of Newington

    2011 Ct. Sup. 12011 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2011)

    Like other contract modifications, whether an employment agreement has been modified is a question of fact. See Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., supra, 234 Conn. 15 (finding that employment agreement has been modified requires fair preponderance of the evidence that employer undertook agreement to modify existing relationship); see also Shelton v. Olowosoyo, 125 Conn.App. 286, 291, 10 A.3d 45 (2010) ("[W]hether the parties to a contract intended to modify the contract is a question of fact"). In the present case, the plaintiff signed the offer of employment letter on August 13, 2004 and then signed the checklist confirming she received the 1967 handbook on August 17, 2004.