From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shelton v. Mriglobal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 26, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02891-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02891-PAB-MJW

01-26-2012

DAVID M. SHELTON, and DESIGNSENSE, INC., Plaintiff(s), v. MRIGLOBAL, a non-profit corporation, formally Midwest Research Institute its National Renewable Energy Laboratory Division, and ALLIANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, LLC, Defendant(s).


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (docket no. 18) is GRANTED. The Second Amended Complaint (docket no. 18-1) is ACCEPTED for filing as of the date of this minute order. The Defendants shall have up to and including February 15, 2012, to respond the Second Amended Complaint.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), "[t]he court should freely give leave [to amend] when justice so requires." "Refusing leave to amend is generally only justified upon a showing of undue delay, undue prejudice to the opposing party, bad faith or dilatory motive, failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, or futility of amendment." Bylin v. Billings, 568 F.3d 1224, 1229 (10th Cir. 2009) (quoting Frank v. U.S. West, Inc., 3 F.3d 1357, 1365 (10th Cir. 1993).


Summaries of

Shelton v. Mriglobal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 26, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02891-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Shelton v. Mriglobal

Case Details

Full title:DAVID M. SHELTON, and DESIGNSENSE, INC., Plaintiff(s), v. MRIGLOBAL, a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02891-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Jan. 26, 2012)