From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shelton v. Knowles

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 7, 2007
No. CIV-S-07-0172 FCD-GGH (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-07-0172 FCD-GGH.

August 7, 2007

JOHN BALAZS, Bar #157287, Attorney At Law, Sacramento, California, Attorney for Petitioner, ADAM SHELTON, JR.

CATHERINE CHATMAN, Deputy Attorney General, Attorney for Respondent, Mike Knowles, Acting Warden.


STIPULATION AND ORDER


Petitioner Adam Shelton, Jr., through his counsel John Balazs, and Respondent Mike Knowles, through his counsel, Deputy Attorney General Catherine Chatman, hereby stipulate and request that the Court extend the Court's prior scheduling order by one week with the new dates as follows:

1. Should petitioner elect to proceed on the original petition, petitioner must so inform the Court, as well as file any supplemental memorandum of points and authorities on or before August 10, 2007;

2. Should petitioner elect to proceed upon an amended petition of exhausted claims only, petitioner must file the amended petition on or before August 10, 2007.

3. If petitioner proceeds as set forth either under no. 1 or 2 above, respondent must file an answer or dispositive motion within 30 days thereafter; petitioner must file any reply or opposition, as appropriate, within 30 days of service of respondent's responsive pleading; if respondent files a motion, respondent will have 15 days after service of an opposition to file a reply.

4. Should petitioner identify unexhausted claims which petitioner will seek to exhaust, petitioner shall file an amended petition, on or before August 10, 2007, setting forth all claims, exhausted and unexhausted, and shall demonstrate good cause for having failed to exhaust state court remedies as to any claim which petitioner would seek to exhaust. Petitioner shall move the court to hold the proceedings in abeyance pending exhaustion of state court remedies as to the unexhausted claims, on or before August 10, 2007; if a stay is ultimately granted, petitioner must immediately pursue state court exhaustion, that is, within 30 days of the granting of a stay, and, upon said exhaustion in state court, within 30 days, proceed upon the amended petition in federal court.

5. Should respondent object to any motion for a stay of proceedings by petitioner to pursue unexhausted claims, respondent must file any opposition to such a motion within 30 days of service thereof; thereafter, petitioner has 15 days to file any reply.

6. If petitioner intends to make a motion for leave to conduct discovery under the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 6(a), petitioner must do so by no later than August 10, 2007; if respondent opposes any such motion respondent must do so within 30 days thereafter; petitioner's reply, if any must be filed within 15 days of any opposition by respondent.

7. If petitioner chooses to move for an evidentiary hearing on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, as he anticipates, or on any other or additional ground, petitioner must do so at the earliest appropriate opportunity; should petitioner file a motion for an evidentiary hearing, respondent, who anticipates opposing the motion, must file any oppositions within 30 days of service of the motion, and petitioner must file any reply within 15 days of service of any opposition.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shelton v. Knowles

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 7, 2007
No. CIV-S-07-0172 FCD-GGH (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2007)
Case details for

Shelton v. Knowles

Case Details

Full title:ADAM SHELTON, JR., Petitioner, v. MIKE KNOWLES, Acting Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 7, 2007

Citations

No. CIV-S-07-0172 FCD-GGH (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2007)