From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shelton v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
Jun 12, 2014
Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00229 (W.D. Va. Jun. 12, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00229

06-12-2014

DORSEY LUTHER SHELTON, Plaintiff, v. CLARKE, ET AL, Defendant(s).


MEMORANDUM OPINION


By: Norman K. Moon

United States District Judge

Dorsey Luther Shelton, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . By Order entered 05/20/2014, the court directed plaintiff to submit within 10 days from the date of the Order to sign and return the Consent to Fee form. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice.

More than 10 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described conditions because he failed to return the Consent to Fee form. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff.

__________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Shelton v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
Jun 12, 2014
Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00229 (W.D. Va. Jun. 12, 2014)
Case details for

Shelton v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:DORSEY LUTHER SHELTON, Plaintiff, v. CLARKE, ET AL, Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 12, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00229 (W.D. Va. Jun. 12, 2014)

Citing Cases

Tate v. Norton

The accounts of an administrator settled by the Probate Court cannot be collaterally attacked or questioned.…