From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shelton v. Cable Express

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 2000
275 A.D.2d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

September 29, 2000

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J. — Dismiss Pleading.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., WISNER, SCUDDER AND LAWTON, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly denied defendants ' motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens ( see, CPLR 327 [a]). Contrary to defendants' contention, the occurrence of the motor vehicle accident in New York is not the only connection with this State. An eyewitness is a New York resident and, as a result of the investigation of the New York State Police, defendant William K. Closser was cited for following too closely in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 (a) ( cf., Dales v. Tiessen, 231 A.D.2d 920; Singh v. Zuidema, 221 A.D.2d 1020).


Summaries of

Shelton v. Cable Express

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 2000
275 A.D.2d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Shelton v. Cable Express

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH D. SHELTON, SR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CABLE EXPRESS, INC., AND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 29, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 603

Citing Cases

Bodea v. Transnat Express

The police and medical personnel at the scene of the accident reside in New York, including the New York…