From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shelley v. Patrick

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 2, 2010
Case No. 3:09-cv-181-MBC-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-181-MBC-KAP.

December 2, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on November 2, 2010, docket no. 38, recommending that the defendants' motions to dismiss, docket no. 21 and docket no. 34, should be granted. The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had fourteen days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No one has filed objections and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the record, the Report and Recommendation, and noting the absence of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 24th day of November, 2010, it is ORDERED that defendants' motions to dismiss, docket no. 21 and docket no. 34, are granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (Doc. 37) is denied. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Shelley v. Patrick

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 2, 2010
Case No. 3:09-cv-181-MBC-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Shelley v. Patrick

Case Details

Full title:BARRY E. SHELLEY, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE PATRICK, WARDEN, S.C.I. HOUTZDALE…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 2, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-181-MBC-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 2, 2010)