From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shelley v. Britton

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 18, 2010
Civil No. 09-80 Johnstown (W.D. Pa. Jun. 18, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-80 Johnstown.

June 18, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter were referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on May 27, 2010 (Doc. No. 11), recommending that petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied as moot and because the petitioner's claims were procedurally defaulted, and that a certificate of appealability be denied.

The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner timely filed objections and a brief (Doc. Nos. 12 13), which repeat the arguments advanced in his filing of last August (Doc. No. 10).

After de novo review of the record of this matter together with the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 18th day of June, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. A certificate of appealability is denied. The portion of the Report and Recommendation recommending denial of the petition on the grounds of procedural default is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Shelley v. Britton

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 18, 2010
Civil No. 09-80 Johnstown (W.D. Pa. Jun. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Shelley v. Britton

Case Details

Full title:BARRY E. SHELLEY, Petitioner, v. RANDALL BRITTON, SUPERINTENDENT, S.C.I…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 18, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-80 Johnstown (W.D. Pa. Jun. 18, 2010)