From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shellberry v. Albright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 12, 1999
262 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Filed May 12, 1999

Appeal from the Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Joslin, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., HAYES, PIGOTT, JR., HURLBUTT AND CALLAHAN, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant Edwin J. Shoemaker for summary judgment with leave to renew upon completion of all discovery. Where pertinent facts essential to justify opposition to a motion for summary judgment are exclusively within the knowledge and control of the movant and may be revealed through pretrial discovery, summary judgment should be denied ( see, CPLR 3212 [f]; Blue Bird Coach Lines v. 107 Delaware Ave., 125 A.D.2d 971; Mack v. Gregory Mem. Hosp., 90 A.D.2d 969).


Summaries of

Shellberry v. Albright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 12, 1999
262 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Shellberry v. Albright

Case Details

Full title:LOUISE A. SHELLBERRY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MARY C. ALBRIGHT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 12, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
693 N.Y.S.2d 466

Citing Cases

Shellberry v. Albright

In December 1996 plaintiff first asserted causes of action against Shoemaker and defendant Mary C. Albright,…

Hammond v. Alekna Construction, Inc.

Plaintiffs, employees and former employees of Utica City School District, allege that Harza's negligent…