From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shell v. Koenig

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 7, 2021
Case No. CV 19-0692-JVS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. CV 19-0692-JVS (JEM)

01-07-2021

DONNELL SHELL, Petitioner, v. CRAIG KOENIG, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: January 7, 2021

/s/_________

JAMES V. SELNA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Shell v. Koenig

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 7, 2021
Case No. CV 19-0692-JVS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Shell v. Koenig

Case Details

Full title:DONNELL SHELL, Petitioner, v. CRAIG KOENIG, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 7, 2021

Citations

Case No. CV 19-0692-JVS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2021)