From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shell Oil Co. v. Zoning Bd. Adj. Shrewsbury

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 20, 1974
316 A.2d 5 (N.J. 1974)

Opinion

Argued February 5, 1974 —

Decided February 20, 1974.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Robert H. Otten argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. Crowell Otten, attorneys; Mr. David W. Clark on the brief.)

Mr. Lawrence A. Carton, III argued the cause for the respondent ( Messrs. Pillsbury, Barnacle, Russell Carton, attorneys; Mr. John G. Colannino on the brief.)



The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kolovsky, reported at 127 N.J. Super. 60, 62 (1974).

For reversal — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justice JACOBS, HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 7.

For affirmance — None.


Summaries of

Shell Oil Co. v. Zoning Bd. Adj. Shrewsbury

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 20, 1974
316 A.2d 5 (N.J. 1974)
Case details for

Shell Oil Co. v. Zoning Bd. Adj. Shrewsbury

Case Details

Full title:SHELL OIL COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 20, 1974

Citations

316 A.2d 5 (N.J. 1974)
316 A.2d 5

Citing Cases

Terner v. Spyco, Inc.

Spyco, however, in its brief refers to it as a subsection c(1) variance. The standard of review by an…

Shields v. Bd. of Adjustment Tp. of Mansfield

We so hold, mindful of the somewhat limited scope of review by a trial court and appellate court of this kind…