From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sheldon v. Zook

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Sep 25, 2023
3:20-CV-3356-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2023)

Opinion

3:20-CV-3356-B-BH

09-25-2023

GARY SHELDON, # 13437-045, Petitioner, v. K ZOOK, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JANE J. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. §2241 , received on November 10, 2020 (doc. 3), is SUMMARILY DISMISSED with prejudice.

A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required to appeal the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Padilla v. United States, 416 F. 424, 425 (5th Cir. 2005). If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account.


Summaries of

Sheldon v. Zook

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Sep 25, 2023
3:20-CV-3356-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Sheldon v. Zook

Case Details

Full title:GARY SHELDON, # 13437-045, Petitioner, v. K ZOOK, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Sep 25, 2023

Citations

3:20-CV-3356-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2023)