Sheldon v. PRG Nevada I, Inc.

Full title: Joanna SHELDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRG NEVADA I, INC.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 21, 2002

31 F. App'x 417 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

31 Fed.Appx. 417 (9th Cir. 2002) Joanna SHELDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRG NEVADA I, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 01-15897. D.C. No. CV-99-01024-LDG/PAL. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 21, 2002

Submitted February 11, 2002. ^*

* This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding.

Before B. FLETCHER, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Joanna Sheldon appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of her former employer PRG Nevada I, Inc., in her action under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Nevada state law, alleging that PRG failed to accommodate her multiple sclerosis. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the award of summary judgment de novo, Braunling v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc., 220 F.3d 1154, 1156 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.

Because Sheldon failed to create a genuine issue that she was qualified for her position, the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of PRG. See id.

Sheldon's remaining contentions are rejected.

Sheldon's motion for an extension of time is denied.

AFFIRMED.