Summary
noting that, although agency examining consultants "discuss[ed] the [claimant]'s work capabilities," their reports were not RFC opinions to the extent that "they both employ[ed] qualifiers such as 'may' and 'likely' and d[id] not always translate actual or expected difficulties into specific limitations"
Summary of this case from Russell B. v. BerryhillOpinion
CIVIL NO. 2:13-CV-315-DBH
07-15-2014
DALE SHELDON, III, PLAINTIFF v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEFENDANT
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On June 25, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on July 14, 2014, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2014
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE