- Search with
- Parallel SearchEnter a full sentence between 5 and 30 words to find cases with conceptually similar sentences
- or
- Keyword SearchEnter keyword terms, accompanied by optional Boolean connectors
- ANDfraud AND damagesBoth terms in document
- ORcar OR automobileEither term in document
- NOTinfringement NOT patentTerm must not appear in document
- """due diligence"Exact match
- ()appeal AND (verdict OR judgment)Grouping terms
- *withdr*wSingle letter wildcard (withdraw, withdrew)
- !infring!Root expander (infringe, infringed, infringing)
- /ninvestor /5 diligenceTerms within n words of each other
- /sfees /s reasonableTerms within same sentence
- /padmissible /p warrantTerms within the same paragraph
Shelby County Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Gilless
972 S.W.2d 683 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998)5 Citing cases
In re C.H.
No. E2016-00702-COA-R9-PT (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 31, 2017) Cited 1 timesNoting that the grandparents at issue were "neither the guardian nor custodian of the child" within the meaning of section 36-1-117
This decision should not be reversed by an appellate court absent a showing of abuse of discretion." Shelby Cty. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Gilless, 972 S.W.2d 683, 685 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997) (citing Tenn. R. Civ. P. 24.02; Ballard v.Herzke, 924 S.W.2d 652, 658 (Tenn. 1996)).
Brewer v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty.
No. M2023-00788-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 30, 2023)See Shelby Cnty. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Gilless, 972 S.W.2d 683, 685 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Vinson v. Ball
No. E2015-01856-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2016) Cited 1 timesThis decision should not be reversed by an appellate court absent a showing of abuse of discretion." Shelby Cnty. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Gilless, 972 S.W.2d 683, 685 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). Furthermore, as our Supreme Court has explained:
Burrus v. Wiseman
No. W2008-01707-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 26, 2009)Under typical circumstances, this statute envisions "an adversary proceeding between [the county official] and the county executive." Shelby Co. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Gilless, 972 S.W.2d 683, 685 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1997). The circumstances in the present case, however, were far from typical.
Manufactures Consol. Ser. v. Rodell
42 S.W.3d 846 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000) Cited 115 times 1 Legal AnalysesFinding that a conspiracy to commit intentional torts in Tennessee defeated fiduciary shield
Id.; accordShelby County DeputySheriff's Ass'nv. Gilless, 972 S.W.2d 683, 685 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1997). As an initial matter, we are not convinced that Turner's motion to intervene even met the requirements for a permissive intervention because the motion failed to establish the existence of any questions of law or fact common to both Turner's claims and the underlying action.