Opinion
2:23-cv-02653-MSN-cgc
12-18-2023
JURY DEMAND
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; REMANDING CASE TO
STATE COURT; AND DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE THE MATTER
MARK S. NORRIS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is the above captioned case removed to this Court by Defendant Willie Gordon. (ECF No. 1.) On November 27, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this matter be remanded to state court. (“Report,” ECF No. 9.) For the reasons below, this Court ADOPTS the Report and REMANDS this matter to state court.
BACKGROUND
On October 11, 2023, Defendant removed this case to this Court from the Shelby County General Sessions Court on grounds that it arose under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. (ECF No. 1 at PageID 6.) The Magistrate Judge observed, however, that the allegations at issue in this case involve violations of city ordinances and do not involve federal questions. (ECF No. 9 at PageID 37.) She also found that there was no basis for removal to this Court based on diversity jurisdiction since Defendant is a citizen of Tennessee. (Id. (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b).)
DISCUSSION
The Report explicitly stated that objections to it must be filed within fourteen (14) days of being served a copy of the Report. (ECF No. 9 at PageID 38.) It also stated that failure to timely object “may constitute a waiver of objections, exceptions, and any further appeal.” (Id.) Defendant did not file any objections and the time for doing so has passed. Even so, this Court has reviewed the Report and agrees that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and that removal under 28 U.S.C. §1441 is thus improper.
CONCLUSION
The Report (ECF No. 9) is ADOPTED. This case is REMANDED to the Shelby County General Sessions Court and the Clerk is DIRECTED to close this matter without entry of judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.