Opinion
April 17, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
We have examined the circumstances of this case and find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion. Rubin, J.P., Kooper, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.