From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sheehan v. Cooperman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2009
66 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2009-08312.

October 20, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the enforcement of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 30, 2009, in an underlying criminal action entitled People v Sheehan, pending under Queens County indictment No. 1124/08.

Michael G. Dowd, New York, N.Y. (Niall Mac Giollabhui of counsel), for petitioner.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Donna Aldea of counsel), respondent pro se.

Before: Dillon, J.P., Eng, Belen and Hall, JJ., concur.


Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary writ of prohibition is available only where there exists a clear legal right, and only in those cases where a court acts or threatens to act in excess of its authorized powers ( see Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 353). It is never available "merely to correct or prevent trial errors of substantive law or procedure, however grievous" ( La Rocca v Lane, 37 NY2d 575, 579, cert denied 424 US 968), nor is it available if there exists an adequate remedy by way of appeal or otherwise ( see Matter of Molea v Marasco, 64 NY2d 718, 720; Matter of Morgenthau v Erlbaum, 59 NY2d 143, cert denied 464 US 993).


Summaries of

Sheehan v. Cooperman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2009
66 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Sheehan v. Cooperman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BARBARA SHEEHAN, Petitioner, v. ARTHUR J. COOPERMAN et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7647
886 N.Y.S.2d 633

Citing Cases

In re John Doe

The extraordinary remedy of prohibition may only be granted if the petitioner establishes a clear legal right…