From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sheahan v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1985
109 A.D.2d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 18, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Orgera, J.).


Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The affidavits based upon personal knowledge which were submitted by respondents clearly establish that respondents did not exercise any degree of control over New York State Route 495 and therefore had assumed no duty with respect to vehicles left abandoned upon the highway shoulder. Plaintiff's submission of his attorney's affirmation, which was not predicated upon personal knowledge, wholly failed to controvert the evidence of respondents. Mere unsubstantiated allegations of negligence by an attorney are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). Plaintiff thus failed to raise any triable issues of fact. Accordingly, we affirm the order insofar as appealed from. Lazer, J.P., Gibbons, Thompson and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sheahan v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1985
109 A.D.2d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Sheahan v. County of Suffolk

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY M. SHEAHAN, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Tizze v. Finlay

The opposition to the motions consists solely of an Affirmation from their attorney who lacks personal…

New York Surety Company v. Costello

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the papers submitted in opposition to the plaintiff's motion for…