From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaw & Reed v. Davis

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1855
5 Cal. 466 (Cal. 1855)

Opinion

         Appeal from the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco.

         COUNSEL:

         Pearkes & Wattson, for Appellant.

          Robinson & Beatty for Respondents.


         JUDGES: Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          MURRAY, Judge

         On the trial of this cause in the Court below, the plaintiffs introduced as a witness one Webb, who testified on his voir dire, that he had negotiated the contract between the parties, and that his brokerage or compensation depended on the plaintiff's recovery; as it was a custom among brokers not to charge commissions in case a sale miscarried.

         The witness was incompetent, and should have been excluded, inasmuch as he was directly interested in the event of the suit.

         Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.


Summaries of

Shaw & Reed v. Davis

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1855
5 Cal. 466 (Cal. 1855)
Case details for

Shaw & Reed v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:Shaw&Reed, Respondents, v. George H. Davis, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1855

Citations

5 Cal. 466 (Cal. 1855)

Citing Cases

State v. McGlynn

         1. It relieves against decrees obtained by fraud. (1 Sto. Eq. Jur. sec. 252; 2 Id. sec. 1522; Adams…

Perlberg v. Gorham

But if he only acted as a factor, or commission merchant, he still had a disqualifying interest. (5 Cal. 466,…