From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaw v. United States

U.S.
Nov 30, 1908
212 U.S. 559 (1908)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

No. 426.

Motion to dismiss or affirm. — Submitted November 16, 1908. Decided November 30, 1908.

American Sugar Refining Co. v. United States, 211 U.S. 155, which held that a direct appeal from the Circuit Court would not lie in a case where the only real substantial point was whether an officer of the United States had misconstrued the tariff act of 1897, followed, and appeal dismissed. Writ of error to reverse 141 F. 469, dismissed.

The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the appellee in support of the motion.

Mr. Edward S. Hatch, for the appellant, in opposition to the motion.


Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Shaw v. United States, 141 F. 469; United States v. Shaw, 144 F. 329, and opinion of Board of General Appraisers, Shaw v. United States, 203 U.S. 591; American Sugar Refining Company v. United States, decided to-day, 211 U.S. 155.


Summaries of

Shaw v. United States

U.S.
Nov 30, 1908
212 U.S. 559 (1908)
Case details for

Shaw v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SHAW v . UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 30, 1908

Citations

212 U.S. 559 (1908)

Citing Cases

Altman Co. v. United States

Barber v. Schell, 107 U.S. 617, 620; Nicholas v. United States, 122 F. 892; United States v. Luyties, 124 F.…

Towne v. Eisner

The Solicitor General, with whom Mr. William C. Herron was on the brief, for defendant in error: As the case…