From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaw v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Apr 13, 1999
988 S.W.2d 138 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 73965.

April 13, 1999.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HON. MICHAEL P. DAVID.

Douglas R. Hoff, St. Louis, for appellant. John Munson Morris, III, Atty. Gen., and Michael P. Barry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Paul J. Simon, P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, and Lawrence E. Mooney, JJ.


ORDER


Movant appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Shaw v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Apr 13, 1999
988 S.W.2d 138 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Shaw v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN SHAW, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Apr 13, 1999

Citations

988 S.W.2d 138 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Tloa Acquisitions, LLC v. Unknown Heirs of Roosevelt Wagner

"The general measure of damages for breach of contract is the amount necessary to place the non-breaching…

Gray v. Petronelli

{¶20} "The general measure of damages for breach of contract is the amount necessary to place the…